Are Infrastructure Brands Competing On The Wrong Things?

Walk through the LinkedIn presence of any serious player in energy, utilities, construction, or electrical contracting and you'll find roughly the same story told in roughly the same way.

Safety culture. ESG commitments. Competitive pay. Career path. Community investment.

All of it real. All of it genuinely important. And all of it exactly what the company next to them is also saying.

Therein lies the problem. These aren't differentiators. At least, not anymore. They're the baseline. The things every credible player in the space must have. Leading with them puts everyone at the same table with the same pitch at the time same, competing for attention on terms nobody can win.

The work itself is more interesting than the way it’s being talked about it. The gap between what these companies are actually doing and how they present themselves publicly is surprisingly wide.

What Red Wing Got Right Wasn't The Product.

Red Wing has been making boots in Red Wing, Minnesota since 1905. That's not a brand story they invented. It's a brand story that was already there.

What they figured out is that the product — the boot — isn't what people are attaching to. It's the craft behind it. The people who've been on the floor for decades. The cultures that have built identity around the work boot because of what the work demands.

So that's what they put in front of people. The process. The material choices. The people doing the work. The reason something gets made the way it gets made.

The behind-the-scenes didn't become a content play. It became the foundation of the brand. Everything else — the campaigns, the retail presence, the collaborations — grows from that foundation. Strip it away and you've got a shoe.

John Deere has done something similar, from a different direction. The brand doesn't really live in the equipment specs. It lives in the operators. The farmers who've run the same model for 20 years. The conditions under which the machinery gets used. The stakes of the work it's being asked to do.

The equipment is the product. The people using it, and the reality of what they're doing, is the brand.

The Work Infrastructure Companies Do Has The Same Raw Material. Most Of Them Aren't Using It.

An energy company has a process. They have people who understand that process at a level most of the public never sees. The work is physically demanding, technically complex with stakes that are genuinely high. It powers hospitals, moves through infrastructure that took decades to build, keeps things running when conditions make that difficult.

That's not a story in search of a brand. That's a brand in search of someone willing to tell the story honestly.

The craft is there. The people are there. The reason the work exists at all is there.

What's mostly missing is the decision to treat that material as brand equity rather than operational background.

The brands that are starting to figure this out aren't producing more content. They're pointing the camera somewhere different. They’re pointing the camera at the process, at the people doing it, at the real conditions under which the work happens.

And what comes back isn't a safety reel or a career path overview. It’s something credible that can be imagined as a viable option. It’s the story of a little kid telling the world what they think mom and dad does.

Maybe they're wearing their parents boots while they're talking about it.

There's A Talent Dimension To This That Doesn't Get Discussed Enough.

Infrastructure industries are competing for a generation of workers who, in many cases, have no clear picture of what the work looks like. That's not indifference. It's a visibility problem.

If the only public-facing story an energy company tells is safety culture and benefits packages, the person who might have been genuinely interested in the work never gets a reason to look closer. The work never becomes legible to them. And legibility — being able to see yourself doing something, understanding why it matters — is a precondition for interest.

You can't recruit people into something they can't picture.

Red Wing doesn't have to convince people that making boots is meaningful work. They show it. The craft, the precision, the longevity of the people doing it. The meaning is embedded in the visibility of the process.

Infrastructure companies have work that's at least as meaningful, often more so. The barrier isn't the work. It's the willingness to make it visible.

Coherence First. Then The Comms Start To Actually Work.

The brands that figure this out stop competing on table stakes because they're no longer playing that game.

Safety culture and competitive pay still matter. They're not going away. But they move from being the lead to being the context. The brand isn't built around the baseline. It's built around what makes the work real — the process, the people, the reason it exists — and the baseline becomes assumed rather than highlighted.

That's a different kind of presence. Harder to replicate. Harder to compete with directly. And considerably more durable than any campaign built on parity.

The story is already inside these companies. The question is whether anyone is going to tell it.

‍

Jeff Skatzka is Co-founder and Creative Director of Measure Creative Group, where he helps growing companies build brands that stay coherent as they evolve.

‍

‍